The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC

il flag

Israeli Premier League Form Table

Israeli Premier League Form (Last 10)
Pos Team P W D L F A GD PtsBTTS G15 km15
1Ironi Tiberias10631146+8212246
2Hapoel Be'er Sheva106222014+6206392
3Maccabi Netanya10532189+9185268
4Hapoel Ramat Gan105321610+6188277
5Maccabi Tel Aviv105232416+817732749
6Hapoel Kiryat Shmona105141713+41652140
7Maccabi Haifa105141817+116610
8Beitar Jerusalem104421515016710
9Maccabi Petah Tikva103521513+2148295
10Hapoel Haifa102531012-211500
11Hapoel Tel Aviv10325912-311322631
12Hapoel Jerusalem10316614-8102250
13Hapoel Petah Tikva10136818-1065299
14Bnei Sakhnin10136416-1262276

xPts is shown for both the 6 games and last 10 games.
For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Israeli Premier League (Expected Points)
PosTeamP6PtsxPtsPts v xPts P10PtsxPtsPts v xPts
1Ironi Tiberias615 1021 
2Maccabi Haifa613 1016 
3Hapoel Be'er Sheva613 1020 
4Maccabi Petah Tikva612 1014 
5Maccabi Netanya611 1018 
6Hapoel Kiryat Shmona610 1016 
7Hapoel Ramat Gan610 1018 
8Hapoel Haifa69 1011 
9Maccabi Tel Aviv68 1017 
10Hapoel Petah Tikva66 106 
11Beitar Jerusalem66 1016 
12Hapoel Jerusalem66 1010 
13Hapoel Tel Aviv65 1011 
14Bnei Sakhnin61 106 
Key to column names
  • P6/P10 - First column showing results grouped into either last 6 or last 10 games
  • Pts - Actual points earned during the last 6 or 10 games
  • xPts - Expected points from those games, based on aggregated xG (expected goals) for and against
  • Pts v xPts - Comparison of actual versus expected points (positive = over-performance; negative = under-performance)

For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Goals scored and conceded (Last 10)
Pos Team FAGDMG BTTS SF CF CS TF
1Ironi Tiberias1468202/10 (20%)7/10 (70%)1/10 (10%)7/10 (70%)24
2Hapoel Be'er Sheva20146346/10 (60%)7/10 (70%)3/10 (30%)4/10 (40%)45
3Maccabi Netanya1899275/10 (50%)4/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)27
4Hapoel Ramat Gan16106268/10 (80%)6/10 (60%)4/10 (40%)2/10 (20%)26
5Maccabi Tel Aviv24168407/10 (70%)7/10 (70%)3/10 (30%)3/10 (30%)21
6Hapoel Kiryat Shmona17134305/10 (50%)4/10 (40%)6/10 (60%)4/10 (40%)28
7Maccabi Haifa18171356/10 (60%)4/10 (40%)6/10 (60%)1/10 (10%)29
8Beitar Jerusalem15150307/10 (70%)4/10 (40%)5/10 (50%)3/10 (30%)38
9Maccabi Petah Tikva15132288/10 (80%)6/10 (60%)3/10 (30%)2/10 (20%)30
10Hapoel Haifa1012-2225/10 (50%)4/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)31
11Hapoel Tel Aviv912-3213/10 (30%)6/10 (60%)4/10 (40%)3/10 (30%)46
12Hapoel Jerusalem614-8202/10 (20%)4/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)5/10 (50%)34
13Hapoel Petah Tikva818-10265/10 (50%)1/10 (10%)8/10 (80%)1/10 (10%)32
14Bnei Sakhnin416-12202/10 (20%)2/10 (20%)6/10 (60%)3/10 (30%)27
Key to column names
  • F - Goals "for" (scored)
  • A - Goals "against" (conceded)
  • GD - Goal difference (F - A)
  • MG - Match goals (F + A)

  • BTTS - Both Teams to Score (number of games, max 10)
  • SF - Team to Score First (number of games, max 10)
  • CF - Team to Concede First (number of games, max 10)

  • CS - Clean Sheets (number of games, max 10)
  • TF - Mean Time of First Goal (in minutes, by either side)

For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Numbers of Players (Last 10)
Pos TeamPts SP Pl SPG PM SM
1Ironi Tiberias212637   
2Hapoel Be'er Sheva2023283.46525
3Maccabi Netanya1825363.17021
4Hapoel Ramat Gan181120   
5Maccabi Tel Aviv1722243.87022
6Hapoel Kiryat Shmona1628392.96821
7Maccabi Haifa1632413.46725
8Beitar Jerusalem1618243.47218
9Maccabi Petah Tikva141120   
10Hapoel Haifa1125283.97119
11Hapoel Tel Aviv1124274.07023
12Hapoel Jerusalem102126   
13Hapoel Petah Tikva62636   
14Bnei Sakhnin625322.26327
Key to column names
  • Pts - Team points
  • SP - Total number of starting players used over last 10 games
  • Pl - Total number of players (starting + substitutes) used over last 10 games
  • SPG - Mean number of substitutes per game
  • PM - Median number of minutes played for substituted players
  • SM - Median number of minutes played for substitutes

The ELO rating for each team shows its relative strength based on past match results, adjusting dynamically after each game. A value for k of 50 has been used, meaning ratings change more significantly, making them more responsive to recent performance.

Team ELO Ratings
PosTeamELO Rating
ELO ratings are not available for this league

League Table for this division