The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC

il flag

Israeli Premier League Form Table

Israeli Premier League Form (Last 10)
Pos Team P W D L F A GD PtsBTTS G15 km15
1Hapoel Ramat Gan10631189+9218177
2Ironi Tiberias10631167+921310
3Hapoel Be'er Sheva106222113+820521951
4Beitar Jerusalem105411711+619612415
5Maccabi Tel Aviv105232014+617624248
6Maccabi Netanya105231918+117600
7Hapoel Kiryat Shmona105141713+41651140
8Maccabi Haifa105141817+116610
9Maccabi Petah Tikva102621413+112810
10Hapoel Haifa102531012-211500
11Hapoel Tel Aviv10325912-311325039
12Hapoel Jerusalem1032549-511100
13Bnei Sakhnin10136316-136100
14Hapoel Petah Tikva10037719-1235199

xPts is shown for both the 6 games and last 10 games.
For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Israeli Premier League (Expected Points)
PosTeamP6PtsxPtsPts v xPts P10PtsxPtsPts v xPts
1Ironi Tiberias616 1021 
2Maccabi Haifa613 1016 
3Hapoel Be'er Sheva613 1020 
4Hapoel Ramat Gan611 1021 
5Maccabi Netanya610 1017 
6Hapoel Kiryat Shmona610 1016 
7Maccabi Petah Tikva610 1012 
8Hapoel Jerusalem610 1011 
9Hapoel Haifa69 1011 
10Beitar Jerusalem69 1019 
11Maccabi Tel Aviv68 1017 
12Hapoel Tel Aviv65 1011 
13Hapoel Petah Tikva63 103 
14Bnei Sakhnin61 106 
Key to column names
  • P6/P10 - First column showing results grouped into either last 6 or last 10 games
  • Pts - Actual points earned during the last 6 or 10 games
  • xPts - Expected points from those games, based on aggregated xG (expected goals) for and against
  • Pts v xPts - Comparison of actual versus expected points (positive = over-performance; negative = under-performance)

For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Goals scored and conceded (Last 10)
Pos Team FAGDMG BTTS SF CF CS TF
1Hapoel Ramat Gan1899278/10 (80%)7/10 (70%)3/10 (30%)2/10 (20%)25
2Ironi Tiberias1679233/10 (30%)7/10 (70%)1/10 (10%)6/10 (60%)25
3Hapoel Be'er Sheva21138345/10 (50%)7/10 (70%)3/10 (30%)4/10 (40%)45
4Beitar Jerusalem17116286/10 (60%)4/10 (40%)5/10 (50%)3/10 (30%)38
5Maccabi Tel Aviv20146346/10 (60%)8/10 (80%)2/10 (20%)4/10 (40%)22
6Maccabi Netanya19181376/10 (60%)5/10 (50%)4/10 (40%)3/10 (30%)25
7Hapoel Kiryat Shmona17134305/10 (50%)5/10 (50%)5/10 (50%)5/10 (50%)32
8Maccabi Haifa18171356/10 (60%)3/10 (30%)7/10 (70%)1/10 (10%)29
9Maccabi Petah Tikva14131278/10 (80%)6/10 (60%)3/10 (30%)2/10 (20%)29
10Hapoel Haifa1012-2225/10 (50%)4/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)31
11Hapoel Tel Aviv912-3213/10 (30%)6/10 (60%)4/10 (40%)3/10 (30%)46
12Hapoel Jerusalem49-5131/10 (10%)3/10 (30%)5/10 (50%)5/10 (50%)41
13Bnei Sakhnin316-13191/10 (10%)2/10 (20%)6/10 (60%)3/10 (30%)27
14Hapoel Petah Tikva719-12265/10 (50%)1/10 (10%)8/10 (80%)1/10 (10%)29
Key to column names
  • F - Goals "for" (scored)
  • A - Goals "against" (conceded)
  • GD - Goal difference (F - A)
  • MG - Match goals (F + A)

  • BTTS - Both Teams to Score (number of games, max 10)
  • SF - Team to Score First (number of games, max 10)
  • CF - Team to Concede First (number of games, max 10)

  • CS - Clean Sheets (number of games, max 10)
  • TF - Mean Time of First Goal (in minutes, by either side)

For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Numbers of Players (Last 10)
Pos TeamPts SP Pl SPG PM SM
1Hapoel Ramat Gan21     
2Ironi Tiberias212026   
3Hapoel Be'er Sheva2023283.46525
4Beitar Jerusalem1918243.47218
5Maccabi Tel Aviv1722243.96922
6Maccabi Netanya1726373.36525
7Hapoel Kiryat Shmona1624322.96821
8Maccabi Haifa1626333.96327
9Maccabi Petah Tikva12     
10Hapoel Haifa1125283.97119
11Hapoel Tel Aviv1124274.07023
12Hapoel Jerusalem112126   
13Bnei Sakhnin625322.56426
14Hapoel Petah Tikva32126   
Key to column names
  • Pts - Team points
  • SP - Total number of starting players used over last 10 games
  • Pl - Total number of players (starting + substitutes) used over last 10 games
  • SPG - Mean number of substitutes per game
  • PM - Median number of minutes played for substituted players
  • SM - Median number of minutes played for substitutes

The ELO rating for each team shows its relative strength based on past match results, adjusting dynamically after each game. A value for k of 50 has been used, meaning ratings change more significantly, making them more responsive to recent performance.

Team ELO Ratings
PosTeamELO Rating
ELO ratings are not available for this league

League Table for this division