The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC



League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Stockport45+4992
2Mansfield45+4385
3Wrexham45+3685

4MK Dons45+1577
5Crewe45+470
6Barrow44+768
7Crawley Town45+467

8Doncaster44+267
9Walsall45065
10Bradford44-263
11Gillingham45-1163
12AFC Wimbledon45+962
13Harrogate Town45-962
14Notts County45+461
15Tranmere45057
16Morecambe45-1457
17Newport County45-1155
18Accrington Stanley45-1154
19Swindon45-653
20Salford45-1650
21Grimsby45-1549
22Colchester44-1844

23Sutton Utd45-2541
24Forest Green45-3539

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

Follow the Fishy on Twitter
NewsNow logo

Question of the Week

Where will Grimsby be next season?





His Honour
His Honour

Don't Hold Your Breath Waiting For The Cash!

By: Bill Osborne
Date: 13/06/2005

IN the club statement regarding the legal action against the Hammonds solicitors group, the club issues a warning that we should not get carried away by the announcement as litigation can go either way.

One can be assured that the legal representatives of the insurance companies of Hammonds will try every trick in the book to defend their clients, as it is the insurance company or companies that will eventually pay out if the League wins.

One of the main issues to be resolved is the question of liability of the contract acceptance.

The defence will plead, according to the advice I have been given that: "The solicitors only offered advice and it was up to the League to either accept or not the advice given. The League decided to accept the advice and acted upon it. In short, the League signed the contract which was the cause of the financial losses sustained by the clubs due to no guarantees being obtained from the parent companies of ITV Digital. Therefore the League are responsible, not the solicitors."

Now that seems straight enough to me but fortunately or unfortunately, as the case may be, the law is much more complicated than that and it is not as clear cut as it appears.

In any case, we may not see any decision before we pay the outstanding tax bill, so that is another reason we should not get carried away.

I personally have been through the courts in a compensation case and my view is that if during the course of events an out of court settlement is offered, providing the offer is reasonable, the League should accept it rather than risking losing the whole lot.

Better to have half a loaf than none at all.

Mind you, if the case collapses and we get nothing, we can always sue the League for failing to protect us. Didn't one club suggest doing that just after the ITV Digital collapse?

Whatever happens, the Football League has learned a very expensive lesson.

Always read the small print before you sign! Everybody knows that.

Except the Football League perhaps.

Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories


Forum Latest
Thread TitlePostsLatest Post
National League Play-offs4Poojah23/04 14:17
Harry Cardwell13Withnail23/04 14:12
Some Positives?40RonMariner23/04 14:11
Lineup versus Crawley?45Abdul1923/04 14:06
Just back54RonMariner23/04 13:52
Now the inquest 146IlkleyMariner23/04 13:48
Football Twit of the Week 🎖26JK4723/04 13:27
Amos and Hunt returning 4golfer23/04 12:55
Emmanuel Dieseruvwe33sam gy23/04 10:32
Ex-GTFC players thread4,317The_Laughing_Mariner23/04 09:51