|
Abdul19 |
|
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 20,455
Posts Per Day: 3.40
Reputation: 73.77%
Rep Score: +71 / -26
Location: Scarborough
Approval: +17,638
Gold Stars: 220
|
That line up! Just awful!
|
| |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
mike_d |
|
Snakebite drinker
Posts: 357
Posts Per Day: 0.07
Reputation: 84.77%
Rep Score: +3 / 0
Location: Rutland
Approval: +390
Gold Stars: 4
|
Prehaps the clue in that is that we should've been beating Woking at home and it could show that Cambridge are miles ahead of us going into the PO.
Is this the same Woking who beat Luton?
|
| To quote - Insanely amazing or amazingly insane. Life as a Town Fan. |
|
|
|
|
mike_d |
|
Snakebite drinker
Posts: 357
Posts Per Day: 0.07
Reputation: 84.77%
Rep Score: +3 / 0
Location: Rutland
Approval: +390
Gold Stars: 4
|
I'm really annoyed, maybe I shouldn't be posting when I'm in this mood but if we do reach the playoffs, I can't see him taking us up. Absolutely ridiculous decision to play a reserve side tonight. We should've got the three points, one at best, played a weaker side at home against a struggling Chester on Saturday keeping fresher legs for the more difficult game against Halifax the following Tuesday.
Am I mad or does this make sense? I just don't get him!!
The struggling Chester who are above Dartford in the table, and have won two out of their last three games, with Dartford only winning one out of their last three (yes, tonights game). A couple of inches difference for Cook twice and it might have been a different story. Personally I think it was good to blood the second-string in a game against a team fighting for their lives,, but knowing it is one of a game or two in hand on the other contenders, with a four point cushion on that last playoff place. Better to know know how they handle it than have to rely on a relative unknown quantity if we need to put them in in the playoffs/ later games this season. I also liked seeing Cook and Tounkara actually talk and gee each other up as a strike pair, especially when Tounkara came close in the first half.
|
| To quote - Insanely amazing or amazingly insane. Life as a Town Fan. |
|
|
|
|
oldun |
|
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 4,341
Posts Per Day: 0.90
Reputation: 90.37%
Rep Score: +57 / -5
Approval: +3,475
|
The way I see it is that at some point PH was going to have to take a risk given the sheer number of games facing Town. I think everyone would agree that Halifax isn't the game to do it in which leaves tonight or Saturday. Whilst Saturday looks a very good option, the great unknown is what effect Tuesday's game had on those who played and what effect travelling down to Dartford would have had on those players. Had Tuesday's players with maybe one or two changes gone out there tonight and not performed (there was absolutely no guarantee that they would have done so) we could have been looking at playing Saturday with our first team players even more knackered and the same need to win-with Halifax waiting on Tuesday. At least resting tonight gives those players a fighting chance of being able to do their bit-again-not only on Saturday but next Tuesday as well. I wouldn't want to have been the manager having to think his way through that one. A final point-many on here have sung the praises (and rightly so) of most the players who played tonight with several of the more vociferous stating that their particular favourite should be in the best starting XI. If this is the case then exactly how much of a weakened team was it? Obviously I wasn't there but it doesn't sound as though many who listened on the radio thought much of the performance-..... This whole ridiculous situation has been created by the intransigence of the management of this league and the unwillingness of Dartford (unsurprisingly given their position) to play the game at a time more beneficial to us.
This is also my considered view of events. PH looked at the bigger picture and whilst 10 changes is a bit extreme that team should have been capable of getting points and sounds like they were unlucky not to do so. There can be few excuses for a bad result on Sat now though.
|
|
|
|
|
biggles9999 |
|
Main Stander
Posts: 2,809
Posts Per Day: 0.51
Reputation: 69.34%
Rep Score: +24 / -12
Approval: +367
|
[b]The struggling Chester who are above Dartford in the table, and have won two out of their last three games, with Dartford only winning one out of their last three (yes, tonights game).
Chester who have beaten Hyde and Tamworth at home in the last 3. The two teams that are 23rd and 24th in the league.
|
|
|
|
|
mike_d |
|
Snakebite drinker
Posts: 357
Posts Per Day: 0.07
Reputation: 84.77%
Rep Score: +3 / 0
Location: Rutland
Approval: +390
Gold Stars: 4
|
So, against teams who have something to play for? My point is that they wanted a full strength team against Dartford, who are BELOW them, and play a weakened team against a team that are confident having beaten the teams around them. Dartford managed a win against a reserve side who hadn't played together; not that that should make any difference at all. We can choose things to suit the argument. Personally, I think Chester are the stronger team, so PH did the right thing.
|
| To quote - Insanely amazing or amazingly insane. Life as a Town Fan. |
|
|
|
|
cmackenzie4 |
|
Recovering Alcoholic
Posts: 58,543
Posts Per Day: 11.22
Reputation: 92.05%
Rep Score: +130 / -10
Location: Grimsby
Approval: +14,345
Gold Stars: 34
|
Not winning last night has now made Saturday a must win game imo.
|
| Grimsby and proud! |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
biggles9999 |
|
Main Stander
Posts: 2,809
Posts Per Day: 0.51
Reputation: 69.34%
Rep Score: +24 / -12
Approval: +367
|
So, against teams who have something to play for? My point is that they wanted a full strength team against Dartford, who are BELOW them, and play a weakened team against a team that are confident having beaten the teams around them. Dartford managed a win against a reserve side who hadn't played together; not that that should make any difference at all. We can choose things to suit the argument. Personally, I think Chester are the stronger team, so PH did the right thing.
I don't disagree that Hurst did the right thing last night. But Hyde have had nothing to play for since about October time, and Tamworth would have needed a miracle to stay up. For what its worth they are currently 12 points away from getting out of the relegation zone with 12 points available.
|
|
|
|
|
Mariners_15 |
|
Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,631
Posts Per Day: 0.31
Reputation: 80.6%
Rep Score: +17 / -4
Approval: +538
Gold Stars: 1
|
How some people aren't viewing this as a missed opportunity is beyond me. We could have gone 7 points clear in the play-off's with a result last night
|
|
|
|
|
marinette |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,299
Posts Per Day: 1.05
Reputation: 88.56%
Rep Score: +38 / -4
Approval: +320
Gold Stars: 3
|
If I had to choose between a bunch of players who were used to playing together in matches but who had had several games in quick succession and were likely to be physically and mentally drained (well I was mentally drained after Tues, anyway!) or another bunch of players who presumably are used to playing together in training and who are physically quite fresh, raring to go and desperate to prove their ability, I would go for the second bunch of players every time, and give the first lot a rest. No arguments at all with last night's team selection. In fact I think our normal 'first team' would probably have lost by a bigger margin, as I expect they were already fairly kna*kered, even before that long journey.
|
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|