The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC



League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Port Vale16+833
2Crewe15+628
3Doncaster16+428

4Walsall14+1227
5MK Dons16+827
6Notts County16+827
7Grimsby16-625

8AFC Wimbledon14+1023
9Bradford16+423
10Gillingham15+423
11Chesterfield16+922
12Barrow16+222
13Fleetwood Town14+521
14Salford16-321
15Newport County16-720
16Accrington Stanley16-418
17Cheltenham16-418
18Harrogate Town16-818
19Tranmere14-717
20Bromley15-216
21Colchester15-414
22Swindon16-713

23Carlisle16-1512
24Morecambe16-1310

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

Follow the Fishy on Twitter
NewsNow logo

Question of the Week

Is football a business or a sport?




 

The Great Coates Rip Off!

By: Bill Osborne
Date: 17/01/2003

THE new stadium developer and the club have been given notice by the NELC Council that they must sign the 106 agreement or planning permission may be cancelled.

When the Planning Committee meets today, they may set a recommendation that this agreement will have to be signed by the end of February.

Up to this date the 4 main parties in the stadium complex, Grimsby Town FC, N.E.Lincs Council, Sutton Estates, and Chiltern Developments have not signed any legal documents designed to safeguard Great Coates as a village and other items intended such as the provision of landscaping and open spaces, controlled car parking and preventing off-site parking on the Willows estate and providing a park and ride bus service.

Now that is usual practise in developments of this nature and all involved are aware of that.

But both the developer and the club have claimed that some of the provisions in the draft agreement are "onerous"

To me, not fully versed in council speak and particularly the N.E. Lincs Council, having read the full draft agreement, I would be more inclined to say that some of the provisions are "draconian" and it appears to me that the council are lumbering the developer with some of the services that the council should be providing.

Certainly, the council have a duty to protect the Great Coates village and its inhabitants who have invested in their properties and have a right to expect the council to protect their investments.

I do not believe that these provisions are the ones that are worrying the developer, but looking at the cost of some of the conditions, one can see why the project is on hold until major investors are found.

N.E. Lincs Council are demanding a heavy price for their change of mind in granting the stadium planning permission and it places further doubt on the clubs ability to get the project off the ground.

The full draft agreement is now added to this article to enable you to judge for yourselves. It is a fairly long agreement but after wading through the initial legalese, it becomes more interesting as you go on.

There are some errors and omissions but nothing important has been missed. Some tables have been re-created but the data in them is as per the agreement.


To read the 106 Agreeement Click Here!




Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories


Forum Latest
Thread TitlePostsLatest Post
Jason Stockwood5BirtlesHatTrick22/11 16:56
BOXING DAY14rancido22/11 16:48
Fun weather forecast for Saturday33supertown22/11 16:34
40 years ago161mickylyons22/11 16:18
JANUARY TRANSFER WINDOW 41Limerick Mariner22/11 16:07
Prediction Thread Colchester Home34Brummie Codfather22/11 14:52
Colchester Saturday19wuffing22/11 11:58
"Beat the Clock"  Colchester21Wiley240522/11 09:33
It’s all gone ‘quite’10SpiritOf9822/11 09:16
TV Games/Upcoming Fixtures3SiteBot22/11 03:30