The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC



League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Stockport46+4892
2Wrexham46+3788
3Mansfield46+4386

4MK Dons46+1578
5Doncaster46+571
6Crewe46+471
7Crawley Town46+670

8Barrow46+669
9Bradford46+269
10AFC Wimbledon46+1365
11Walsall46-465
12Gillingham46-1164
13Harrogate Town46-963
14Notts County46+361
15Morecambe46-1458
16Tranmere46-357
17Accrington Stanley46-857
18Newport County46-1455
19Swindon46-654
20Salford46-1651
21Grimsby46-1749
22Colchester46-2145

23Sutton Utd46-2542
24Forest Green46-3442

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

Follow the Fishy on Twitter
NewsNow logo

Question of the Week

Where will Grimsby be next season?





His Honour
His Honour

Don't Hold Your Breath Waiting For The Cash!

By: Bill Osborne
Date: 13/06/2005

IN the club statement regarding the legal action against the Hammonds solicitors group, the club issues a warning that we should not get carried away by the announcement as litigation can go either way.

One can be assured that the legal representatives of the insurance companies of Hammonds will try every trick in the book to defend their clients, as it is the insurance company or companies that will eventually pay out if the League wins.

One of the main issues to be resolved is the question of liability of the contract acceptance.

The defence will plead, according to the advice I have been given that: "The solicitors only offered advice and it was up to the League to either accept or not the advice given. The League decided to accept the advice and acted upon it. In short, the League signed the contract which was the cause of the financial losses sustained by the clubs due to no guarantees being obtained from the parent companies of ITV Digital. Therefore the League are responsible, not the solicitors."

Now that seems straight enough to me but fortunately or unfortunately, as the case may be, the law is much more complicated than that and it is not as clear cut as it appears.

In any case, we may not see any decision before we pay the outstanding tax bill, so that is another reason we should not get carried away.

I personally have been through the courts in a compensation case and my view is that if during the course of events an out of court settlement is offered, providing the offer is reasonable, the League should accept it rather than risking losing the whole lot.

Better to have half a loaf than none at all.

Mind you, if the case collapses and we get nothing, we can always sue the League for failing to protect us. Didn't one club suggest doing that just after the ITV Digital collapse?

Whatever happens, the Football League has learned a very expensive lesson.

Always read the small print before you sign! Everybody knows that.

Except the Football League perhaps.

Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories


Forum Latest
Thread TitlePostsLatest Post
Scunthorpe.4,490MuddyWaters02/05 17:00
Jason’s latest Guardian article 78rancido02/05 16:55
New kit22Zero_as_a_limit02/05 16:41
New CEO112arryarryarry02/05 16:33
Ex-GTFC players thread4,326Youngy02/05 16:29
Season ticket prices frozen 63Mappers02/05 16:09
DN35 podcast at 6pm43WayneBurnettsJockstrap02/05 16:06
The Official Summer Transfer Rumour Thread272Poojah02/05 15:25
Free £720 towards Season Tickets 2024/202525The Yard Dog02/05 13:17
EBSFLEET 11GollyGTFC02/05 06:26