The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC

League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Salford9+316
2Barnet7+715
3Crewe9+415

4Cheltenham9+215
5Bristol Rovers9015
6York8+614
7Walsall8+614

8Chesterfield9+314
9Grimsby9+313
10Gillingham9+213
11Rochdale9-113
12Tranmere9011
13Swindon9-411
14Shrewsbury9-511
15Newport County9010
16Accrington Stanley9-110
17Rotherham9-110
18Fleetwood Town9-110
19Colchester8-210
20Exeter9-19
21Oldham8-47
22Northampton7-36

23Port Vale7-65
24Crawley Town7-74

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

The Fishy on XThe Fishy on Bluesky
NewsNow logo

Question of the Week

Should the UK drinking ban in stands be changed?





Fenty Hits Out
Fenty Hits Out

Fenty Blasts PFA

By: Rob Sedgwick
Date: 01/04/2009

TOWN chairman John Fenty has criticised the Players' Union the PFA following their decision to pay the wages of players at Grimsby's League Two rivals. Mr Fenty believes that the PFA is propping up clubs who would otherwise be forced into administration, thus incurring a penalty.

The Town chairman told the Grimsby Telegraph: "I don't know if the PFA has loaned the money to clubs or the players directly, but one thing for sure is that it is meddling in football in ways that could have a profound effect on the game.

"I have brought this to the attention of senior officers within the Football League and they are looking into the matter.

"And we will be expecting to see that clubs, particularly those that are insolvent, have the funds repaid to the PFA immediately from the next Football League distribution which is due shortly.

"While the PFA have not broken rules, on the face of it, these actions are questionable and could result in a legal challenge from non-football creditors or others.

"They only do this knowing that they are preferential creditors within the Football League rules and that their money is protected - as a protected football creditor."

The Town chairman believes more punitive measures should be taken against those clubs who routinely go into administration, timing their decisions to minimise the chances of getting relegated. Grimsby in contrast have never gone into administration and are still paying back debts incurred before the collapse of ITV Digital seven years ago.

Fenty said: "Current sanctions are not working and do not offer an appropriate deterrent. There needs to be additional rule changes to deal with this problem.

"Bigger sanctions are required for those who risk all and effectively spend money they have not secured."

Grim Rob Says: The PFA are protecting their members which is what they exist for, they do not exist for the benefit of football clubs. However there is obviously a huge problem with keeping teams in business and there is a real prospect it seems of some names disappearing altogether. If clubs are manipulating the rules for their own benefit then they should not be allowed to, but if teams are genuinely struggling to stay afloat they should be supported. Grimsby will have to get out of the mess they are in via football, something they have made big steps towards in the last two weeks.

Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories


Forum Latest
Thread TitlePostsLatest Post
Tonight's game.129Abdul1908/10 13:58
Prediction Thread Port Vale A 26/2715thespiffing08/10 13:35
Mr Grimsby Town FC15Maringer08/10 13:31
Maldini 49toontown08/10 13:23
Kabia short-listed for Player of the month4Lost in Lincoln07/10 18:40
Memorial Garden Vandalism.13Yarborough Vaults07/10 17:33
Where is the Gooner?38Mayaman07/10 17:05
Ex-GTFC players thread5,251DB07/10 16:22

This Season and previous Seasons