The Fishy.co.uk Grimsby Town FC

RSS



League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Luton213042
2Notts County211542
3Accrington Stanley201037

4Exeter21436
5Wycombe21934
6Lincoln City21733
7Coventry21732

8Swindon20532
9Mansfield21532
10Colchester21532
11Grimsby21-132
12Newport County21531
13Cambridge Utd21-829
14Carlisle21128
15Cheltenham21-127
16Stevenage21-527
17Crawley Town21-424
18Morecambe21-822
19Port Vale21-1021
20Yeovil21-1320
21Chesterfield21-1320
22Crewe21-1420

23Forest Green21-1720
24Barnet21-917

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2




Question of the Week

Priority for transfer window?

Reduce squad size
Strengthen defence
Strengthen midfield
Strengthen attack
No change needed


 

"Ashamed of Great Coates"

By: Rob Sedgwick
Date: 23/07/2000

"I'm Ashamed of Great Coates"

News From 15th July 2000

New ground

A Great Coates resident has expressed his dismay over the decision by North East Lincolnshire County Council to block GTFC's move to a new stadium in his village. Paul Vessey of Woad Lane in Great Coates also speaks with anger about some of his neighbours who headed the villager's campaign, who he views as "a few NIMBY nutters in the Civic Society", and he also has some interesting comments on the voting process.

Paul's full message to Rob is below...

I have just read your article and I too am completely devastated by the decision.

I am also a resident of Great Coates (Woad Lane) and have voted firmly in support both on GTFC's survey and the planning notice sent by the council to all residents.

I am also ashamed that all Great Coates residents are tarred with the same brush as a few NIMBY nutters in the Civic Society. (there's a democratic organisation if ever there was one - not!).

You need to be aware that those on the council who perhaps would have a greater understanding of the new stadium where prevented from voting. Any councillor who attends more than 50% of games or is a season ticket holder are automatically ruled out and must express an 'interest'. Although it can mean simply a 'strong interest' in the football club and to make it really unhelpful this term was left undefined!

This is based on a legal case based around Liverpool's expansion of Anfield, where a judge ruled that councillors should not have been involved with such an 'interest'. Clearly a big footie supporter himself - not !.

Should you decide to stand and be elected you would also be unable to vote on the issue - leaving it to clowns not the slightest bit interested in the soul of our community.

How do I know this - I have a relative who is a councillor - and a season ticket holder - and one of those excluded from contributing to one of the most important decisions in the life of our community.

I am simplly amazed at so called 'politicians' that fly in the face of such overwhelming public opinion.

It was also recommended by the planning officers!

Those that voted against certainly should be named and shamed. Perhaps they just do not understand the depth of feeling there is and the sense of identity our club gives to the community.

Paul Vessey
Woad Lane
Great Coates


Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories

Forum Latest
TitlePostsLatest Post
Just Back67rancido11/12 12:55
FGR boss' reaction13oldun11/12 12:54
Mitch Rose18oldun11/12 12:51
Portait changes1GrimRob11/12 12:50
Police ban away fans3GrimRob11/12 12:36
Research Grimsby Town supporters3GrimRob11/12 12:33
Ifs and buts12GyMariner11/12 12:01
Twat of the Week14Mariner Ronnie11/12 11:42
Change/add-a-letter/remove-one Word Game thread...30,312cmackenzie411/12 09:49
Word Association Game44,058cmackenzie411/12 09:48

News  | Features  | Submit Article  |   | 
© 2017 TheFishy.co.uk