The Fishy.co.uk Grimsby Town FC

RSS



Player Minutes

PlayerMinutes
Nathan Clarke2,090
James McKeown2,070
Danny Collins2,038
Siriki Dembele1,902
Ben Davies1,721
Paul Dixon1,652
James Berrett1,620
Luke Summerfield1,612
Sam Jones1,592
Mitch Rose1,297
Martyn Woolford1,185

Full Stats
Latest Scores





Question of the Week

Priority for transfer window?

Reduce squad size
Strengthen defence
Strengthen midfield
Strengthen attack
No change needed


 

Official Statement - The Stadium

By: GTFC
Date: 10/04/2003

The club is disappointed to report that planning permission for the new stadium development at Great Coates is in jeopardy. This week's EGM has been called to allow shares to be issued to ensure the survival of the club. The stadium is separately funded.

Final negotiations over the detail of the 106 legal agreement, which must be signed in order for the Council to grant planning permission, have hit a major hurdle after the landowner announced that it was unwilling to sign the agreement.

As a result, planning officers at North East Lincolnshire Council will be recommending that the planning application be refused when it is considered by the Planning Committee on Friday 11th April 2003.

Since the developer, Chiltern Investment Properties, signed a legal agreement with the landowner (Sir Richard Sutton's Settled Estates) in March 1999, it has always been accepted that the landowner would sign the Section 106, thus binding the site with the legal obligations required by the Council as part of the planning permission.

Planning permission cannot be granted unless the land is bound by this agreement, otherwise it would be possible for the landowner to implement the consent without fulfilling the obligations.

Unfortunately, one of the 50% owners of Chiltern Investment Properties was not willing to proceed with the project. Accordingly, the club decided to take the project forward with Gerald Knight's company GKA, the other 50% shareholder in Chiltern. This required a minor revision of the Section 106, which meant that the Club took over the obligations from Chiltern.

There was no change to the obligations binding the landowner. Nevertheless, the landowner has refused to sign the agreement because of the obligations.The Club and its development partner are now taking legal advice and will be making a further statement next week.

In addition, the Club's development partner is considering making an offer for the purchase of the site. If this proved possible, then it would not be necessary for Sutton Estates to be involved in the Section 106 agreement.

Club Chairman Peter Furneaux said: "We are clearly disappointed to hear that the Council is considering refusal of the planning application but we are determined to leave no stone unturned in out efforts to bring this project to fruition. The new stadium is vital to the future of the Club and we are looking to find a way forward."We recognise that, at the moment, there is not a viable scheme in place but we are confident that, given time, we will be able to deliver the new stadium"




Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories

Forum Latest
TitlePostsLatest Post
Notts County match thread34RoboCod16/12 18:32
Leave JF alone . . .41The Old Codger16/12 18:10
Just Back1HertsGTFC16/12 18:05
Looking at the table1StaffsMariner16/12 18:04
Notts County (A) Predictions33promotion plaice16/12 17:35
Ex-GTFC players thread2,225PPMariner16/12 17:34
Word Association Game44,107cmackenzie416/12 17:01
Pyro Dogs18arryarryarry16/12 16:15
Match comms2sonofmadeleymariner16/12 15:58
Free Mince Pie6Gaffer5816/12 14:21

News  | Features  | Submit Article  |   | 
© 2017 TheFishy.co.uk