The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC



League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Stockport44+4789
2Mansfield44+4282
3Wrexham44+3382

4MK Dons44+1374
5Crewe44+770
6Barrow43+968
7Crawley Town44+466

8Walsall44+165
9Doncaster43064
10Gillingham44-1063
11AFC Wimbledon44+1062
12Harrogate Town44-762
13Bradford43-360
14Notts County44+358
15Morecambe44-1357
16Newport County44-1055
17Tranmere44-154
18Accrington Stanley44-954
19Swindon44-453
20Salford44-1747
21Grimsby44-1746
22Colchester43-1744

23Sutton Utd44-2540
24Forest Green44-3636

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

Follow the Fishy on Twitter
NewsNow logo

Question of the Week

Who will go down?







 

League Slammed Over Rule Change Proposal

By: Bill Osborne
Date: 26/04/2003

R3, The trade body representing the business recovery specialists who pick up the pieces when football clubs get into financial difficulty today slammed football league proposals.

The proposals, announced yesterday, mean any club entering into an insolvency procedure could be docked points or possibly even relegated, possibly leading to the loss of some of the UK's most historic clubs.

R3, the Association of Business Recovery Professionals believes the football league has missed the point completely. Following Leicester City's promotion after administration this season, the league seems to be of the view that a club enters into an insolvency procedure to renege on their debts and gain an advantage over its rivals.

An R3 spokesperson said "This over simplifies the true commercial risks facing football clubs - the plain fact of the matter is that financially stricken clubs are forced into administration due to their legal duty to creditors and to avoid prosecution of the directors for knowingly trading while insolvent.

The bottom line is that for many clubs administration is the last resort, not a way of duping the people they owe money to.

What these proposed sanctions are more likely to do is encourage many clubs to trade for longer while insolvent due to a fear of lost points or relegation, and in the long term, as the debts pile up, the main loser will be the creditors who will get paid less as there will be less to go round as losses continue to mount. Stoking up a fear of insolvency is not the answer.

Furthermore, sanctions imposed by the league are likely to damage a club's season. Revenues will go down as fans desert, players will be less motivated and consequently, a competitive advantage will be handed to those clubs who have yet to be played.

The problem lies with inflated wages. A club's biggest overhead is its players' wages. In 2001, these accounted for 105% of the total revenue of the First division alone, and this was before the collapse of ITV Digital which cost each division club £2.5million.

The football league should take action to release clubs form the restrictive super creditor rule which puts a club's players at the top of the pile in terms of who gets paid first in insolvency. It also states that if a club does not pay its players the full amount they are owed in wages then that club faces expulsion from the league.

However, if clubs were able to negotiate with players and alter the amount they were paid according to income levels in order to shake off overheads, reduce arrears and pay creditors, then insolvency would be far less likely. This is what a business recovery specialist would seek to do in any other industry as a mechanism of saving the business. With football clubs, the super-creditor rule prevents them from doing this. R3 believes the answer lies in its abolition.

If sanctions are to be imposed, then they should come at an earlier stage. If clubs do not pay their PAYE consecutively for two months, then they could be docked a point. This would encourage better cash flow management at an earlier stage, not after the final nail has been put into the coffin.

R3 believes these proposals to be bad news for everyday creditors who will get paid less as clubs delay entering into an insolvency procedure, bad news for the clubs themselves because a relegated club is unlikely to attract potentially lifesaving investment and finally bad news for players, as it will inevitably lead to salaries being slashed when they are up for renewal. In short, a measure that is meant to be preventative could lead to the loss of many historic football league clubs."END




Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories


Forum Latest
Thread TitlePostsLatest Post
Just Back 67RonMariner18/04 23:46
"Beat the Clock"  Swindon18WayneBurnettsJockstrap18/04 23:45
Cup Replays Scrapped 56Hagrid18/04 23:02
Lincoln City 238lew chaterleys lover18/04 21:42
Prediction Thread Swindon H15Connecticut Mariner18/04 21:10
The Financial Brutality of The Championship 20CSLM18/04 21:08
Underachievement13CSLM18/04 20:33
Steve Evans30Grimal18/04 16:03
V Swindon 20Nelly GTFC18/04 15:25
Pots11diehardmariner18/04 12:30