2004-2005 POM Scoring System
By: Rob Sedgwick
Date: 25/07/2004
Home > Competitions > 2004-2005 POM > Scoring System |
This year's scoring system is the same as last year's, namely:
- 1 point for each entry.
- 2 points for the right outcome (i.e. win, lose or draw as per your prediction)
- 2 points for the right Grimsby score
- 2 points for the right opposition score
- 3 points for the right Grimsby scorer (provided a scorer is named). Own goals do not count, and the first non-own goal scored by a Grimsby player constitutes the first goal.
- 1 point if Grimsby score 0 goals (and you predicted this)
- 5 points bonus for a Nostradamus POM (a perfect prediction)
- 2 bonus point for the shirt number of the first opposition scorer (if there is one). If the opposition do not score nobody is awarded any points.
The total points score possible for each game (not including the 2 bonus points) is 15 for a scoring game, 13 if Grimsby score 0 goals, you predict this AND get the other team's score right!
Interested? Then if you have not done so please register for the POM.
This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!
Related Stories
Thread Title | Posts | Latest Post | |
---|---|---|---|
Prediction Thread Colchester Home | 32 | Wiley2405 | 22/11 09:35 |
"Beat the Clock" Colchester | 21 | Wiley2405 | 22/11 09:33 |
It’s all gone ‘quite’ | 10 | SpiritOf98 | 22/11 09:16 |
JANUARY TRANSFER WINDOW | 39 | Mappers | 22/11 07:34 |
TV Games/Upcoming Fixtures | 3 | SiteBot | 22/11 03:30 |
BOXING DAY | 11 | Running like emson | 21/11 21:16 |
Colchester Saturday | 18 | The Caterham Mariner | 21/11 19:39 |
Lincs. Cup Highlights | 14 | Lincoln Mariner 56 | 21/11 16:05 |
Pubs in York showing game - Sat | 6 | bradzmilne | 21/11 14:35 |
Lincoln City | 725 | David Frazer | 21/11 12:42 |