Just back

We may well see over the next 180 minutes!

With Disney out for next 2 games we might find out about whether our midfield is good enough without him.

Quoted from Mariner93er

With regards to the who should play between clay and Nolan argument, I cant help but feel everyone has taken for granted disleys selection in all of this. Now I like disley, but today showed a big issue of his, in the tempo of his game. It is simply too slow and as I mentioned earlier, is easy to play against. Could it not be argued that clay being the more defensive and Nolan more attacking combo could be effective?

With Disley taking a self-inflicted two game break, we might be about to find out...

Quoted from wembley_double98

Fatty, attention seeking again...
Get from your computer and go outside, you never know,
you might just make a friend, trouble is you will maybe react to vitamin D overload.
Bless, mummy will make it better xxx

And you're still the second biggest sharp object on this board

Quoted from IlkleyMariner

With Disney out for next 2 games we might find out about whether our midfield is good enough without him.

Or better???

It was like putting lipstick on a pig today - umm I think you know what I mean - enough said!!!

The long awaited slump in form at the top as happened.........................................Pity it's us.

Disley may have had a poor game today, but I'm surprised that some think that Clay plays the ball any more quickly? We've long been anything but dynamic moving the ball through midfield and I'd say Clay is probably worse in this respect than Disley. On a similar note, Bogle needs to let the ball do the work more often as he too often holds onto the ball in a position where there is simple pass on and he simply can't achieve anything by keeping it. By all means take players on in the opposition box, but you're unlucky to get much joy attempting to dribble when surrounded in midfield.

Anyway, hopefully a Clay/Nolan axis will do well (or a Henderson/Nolan one) when Disley is out (though I thought he was unlucky to be booked today).

Let's face it, every team has a bad day now and again when generally capable players can't do much right and you struggle to think of anybody who has had a good game. Unfortunately, when we have a bad day, we simply don't get the result we're looking for. Championship-winning teams get the right result regardless of how well they have or haven't played and we're not capable of it. Guiseley and Boreham Wood have both taken relatively easy points off us mostly because of our poor performances. Cheltenham and FGR would have won at least one of those games in a similar position.

No plan A today, never mind having a plan B.

No guile,creativity, variety or pace needed to break them down. (Most good work came from Nolan).

We do not have enough players who are different enough to make a (winning) difference.

Todat we had the same performance and result that we had against Guiseley at home. In neither game did we did deserve the 3 points against lowly opposition. This weeek it was said that Hurst learns from his mistakes.  Well he has not learnt from the Guiseley game as to how to win.

Borehamwood looked comfortable in the second half against the wind. This says it all really.

They had the sensible approach in the game to fire in a few long range shots.  The one in the first 5 mins nearly caught Macca out.  This was a good tactic that we seldom used.

We miss Townsend a lot (but BarrattStander said on the way home that I cannot mention this as he was not our player).

Pittman played most balls first time, which usually resulted in us losing possession.  A poor display.

Quoted from Maringer

Disley may have had a poor game today, but I'm surprised that some think that Clay plays the ball any more quickly? We've long been anything but dynamic moving the ball through midfield and I'd say Clay is probably worse in this respect than Disley. On a similar note, Bogle needs to let the ball do the work more often as he too often holds onto the ball in a position where there is simple pass on and he simply can't achieve anything by keeping it. By all means take players on in the opposition box, but you're unlucky to get much joy attempting to dribble when surrounded in midfield.

Anyway, hopefully a Clay/Nolan axis will do well (or a Henderson/Nolan one) when Disley is out (though I thought he was unlucky to be booked today).

Let's face it, every team has a bad day now and again when generally capable players can't do much right and you struggle to think of anybody who has had a good game. Unfortunately, when we have a bad day, we simply don't get the result we're looking for. Championship-winning teams get the right result regardless of how well they have or haven't played and we're not capable of it. Guiseley and Boreham Wood have both taken relatively easy points off us mostly because of our poor performances. Cheltenham and FGR would have won at least one of those games in a similar position.

Not sure I agree about Dis and Clay. The problem we have and it was glaringly obvious today is can you tell me who the holding centre mid id and who the attacking one is? They can't decide.......... And then who sits and who presses, they take too long to decide and thus gives the opponents time on the ball. I love Dis but recently I have noticed the "Dis 180" has come back where he takes the ball does a turn and sends us backwards similar to when he played with Scott Kerr.

What I do know is that the link between Richard & Nathan was not as effective today as it did not have Clay working hard to be the pivot for them in midfield.

Haven't  Borehamwood held both VGR and Cheltenham to draws in the last few weeks?